Palantir Data Scientist at a Glance
Interview Rounds
6 rounds
Difficulty
Most candidates prep for this role like it's a standard data science job. Then they walk into the interview and get asked to debug a broken Foundry transform, wire a model into an Ontology action, and present a logistics analysis to a simulated government stakeholder. The single biggest reason people fail Palantir DS loops isn't weak stats or slow coding; it's underestimating how much of this job is engineering and client delivery inside Foundry, not notebooks and experiments.
Palantir Data Scientist Role
Primary Focus
Skill Profile
Math & Stats
HighStrong foundation in statistical modeling, advanced analytical methods, operations research, and statistical programming for data analysis and problem-solving.
Software Eng
HighExperience in application development, DevOps practices, and advanced programming for building, maintaining, and operationalizing data-driven solutions and pipelines.
Data & SQL
ExpertExpertise in designing modern data architectures, building and maintaining ETL pipelines, data modeling, and ensuring data quality, governance, and reliability, especially within platforms like Palantir Foundry.
Machine Learning
HighProficiency in machine learning techniques, including predictive modeling, time-series forecasting, optimization algorithms, clustering, regression, and anomaly detection.
Applied AI
LowWhile the broader team is AI-focused, specific requirements for modern AI/GenAI are not explicitly detailed for this role in the provided sources. General AI understanding is implied.
Infra & Cloud
HighExperience with major cloud platforms (Azure, AWS, GCP), modern data stack technologies, and applying cloud architectural principles for data solutions and deployment.
Business
ExpertDeep understanding of business operations, ability to identify efficiency opportunities, optimize processes, translate complex data insights into actionable recommendations, and drive measurable improvements in operational performance and client success.
Viz & Comms
HighProficiency in data visualization tools (Power BI, Tableau, Looker) for building operational dashboards and KPIs, coupled with strong written and verbal communication skills to convey complex insights to diverse stakeholders.
What You Need
- Data Science and Data Manipulation
- Data Engineering (ETL, Data Modeling, Scalable Architectures)
- Pipeline and Application Development (especially with Palantir Foundry)
- Statistical Modeling and Advanced Analytics
- Machine Learning (Predictive Modeling, Forecasting, Optimization, Clustering, Regression, Anomaly Detection)
- Cloud Platform Experience (Azure, AWS, GCP)
- Data Visualization and Dashboarding
- Operational Analytics (Supply Chain Optimization, Process Improvement, Workforce Planning, Manufacturing Analytics)
- Business Acumen and Cross-functional Collaboration
- Strong Communication Skills (written and verbal)
- Problem-solving and Analytical Skills
- Experience with Palantir Foundry (including Ontology development)
- Ability to obtain and maintain required security clearances (for government-focused roles)
Nice to Have
- Master's Degree in Data Science, Operations Research, Industrial Engineering, Applied Statistics, Computer Science, or a related quantitative field
- Prior professional services or federal consulting experience
- Creativity and innovation (desire to learn and apply new technologies, products, and libraries)
- Strong organizational skills
Languages
Tools & Technologies
Want to ace the interview?
Practice with real questions.
Palantir data scientists own the full stack inside Foundry: ingesting messy client data, writing PySpark transforms in Code Repositories, modeling Ontology objects that map to real-world entities (aircraft parts, hospital beds, supply chain nodes), and then sitting across from a DoD operations lead to explain what the analysis means for their mission. You're measured on whether the client's fraud detection got faster or their logistics routes got cheaper through your deployed Foundry pipelines, not on model accuracy in isolation.
A Typical Week
A Week in the Life of a Palantir Data Scientist
Typical L5 workweek · Palantir
Weekly time split
Culture notes
- Palantir runs intense, mission-driven sprints — weeks are long when you're on-site with a client, and the expectation is that you ship working product in Foundry, not just analysis decks.
- The Denver HQ expects in-office presence most days, and Forward Deployed roles often involve travel to client sites for multi-day workshops.
The writing time is what catches people off guard. Experiment writeups, stakeholder decks, findings docs that translate gradient boosting vs. linear tradeoffs into language a non-technical operations team can act on. You're also not shielded from infrastructure work: when an upstream schema change breaks your Foundry transform DAG, you're the one patching the build error, not filing a ticket for a data engineer.
Projects & Impact Areas
On the Foundry side, you might spend weeks building an Ontology that maps raw sensor data to maintenance clusters for a fleet management client, wiring PySpark transforms through a DAG so the operations team can see real-time asset health. AIP work looks different: designing AI-assisted decision workflows where a military logistics planner clicks a button to trigger a demand forecast directly from an Ontology action, never touching code. From what candidate reports and Palantir's public earnings calls suggest, the commercial side (energy, healthcare, supply chain) is where DS headcount is expanding fastest, though government contracts still define the culture and set the engineering bar.
Skills & What's Expected
Data architecture and pipelines being rated expert-level is the single most important signal about this role. GenAI skills are rated low, which tells you Palantir cares far more about whether you can build and debug Foundry transform DAGs in production-grade PySpark than whether you can fine-tune an LLM. The expert rating on business acumen isn't decorative either: you're presenting Foundry-powered analyses to C-suite clients and government officials who don't care about your F1 score, only whether your Ontology-linked pipeline changes their next operational decision.
Levels & Career Growth
The jump to senior at Palantir isn't about fancier models. It's about owning an entire client's Foundry deployment end to end: scoping the Ontology, deciding which transforms to build, managing stakeholder expectations when source data quality is terrible, and shipping AIP workflows anyway. Because Palantir is still a relatively small company compared to Big Tech, career growth comes from expanding scope across client engagements rather than climbing a long IC ladder, and senior DSs often blur into something closer to a technical account lead who happens to write PySpark.
Work Culture
Forward-deployed roles can involve travel to client sites for multi-day Foundry workshops, though the extent varies by engagement (some candidates report heavy on-site weeks, others stay mostly remote). The Denver HQ leans toward in-office presence most days, per internal culture norms. This is a place where your week gets long when you're on-site with a defense client and the expectation is shipping working Foundry pipelines and Ontology objects, not polished slide decks. Palantir's public messaging about "the hardest problems facing democratic institutions" attracts people who want conviction and repels people who want predictable work-life boundaries. If you thrive on autonomy, ambiguity, and seeing your PySpark transforms actually change how a government agency runs logistics, it's energizing.
Palantir Data Scientist Compensation
Palantir's comp structure leans heavily on equity. The offer notes describe RSUs with a 4-year schedule (citing 25% annual vesting as an example), but the real risk is that equity's paper value at signing can diverge sharply from what you actually vest into, given how volatile Palantir's stock has been in recent years. When you're weighing an offer, stress-test the equity component at 50% and 150% of the grant price to see if the package still works for you in both scenarios.
Both base salary and the RSU grant are negotiable, and a competing offer from another top-tier tech company is the single strongest card you can play for either. If you have one, use it to push on whichever dimension matters more to you, whether that's a larger equity grant or a signing bonus that smooths out your first-year cash flow. Most candidates focus all their energy on one lever and leave the other on the table.
Palantir Data Scientist Interview Process
6 rounds·~4 weeks end to end
Initial Screen
1 roundRecruiter Screen
Initial screening to assess your background, motivations, and interest in Palantir. Expect questions about your resume, career goals, and why you want to work for Palantir. This call also serves to gauge your alignment with the company's mission and values.
Tips for this round
- Research Palantir's mission and projects thoroughly to articulate genuine interest.
- Prepare a compelling narrative about your career trajectory and alignment with Palantir's values.
- Be ready to discuss your favorite and least favorite past projects in detail.
- Have specific, insightful questions ready for the recruiter about the role or company culture.
- Emphasize your comfort discussing topics like civil liberties and data privacy, which are central to Palantir's work.
Technical Assessment
1 roundCoding & Algorithms
This datainterview.com/coding assessment consists of three distinct parts: a coding problem, a SQL query, and an API task. You'll need to demonstrate your proficiency in fundamental programming, database querying, and interacting with external services. The problems are designed to test both your technical skills and problem decomposition abilities.
Tips for this round
- Practice datainterview.com/coding medium-level coding problems, focusing on common data structures and algorithms.
- Master complex SQL queries, including joins, aggregations, window functions, and subqueries.
- Familiarize yourself with common API interaction patterns and how to parse JSON/XML responses.
- Pay attention to edge cases and optimize for time and space complexity in your coding solutions.
- Clearly comment your code and explain your thought process, even in a take-home setting.
Onsite
4 roundsStatistics & Probability
You'll engage in a live technical discussion, often centered around a data science case study or a deep dive into machine learning concepts. Expect to discuss model selection, evaluation metrics, experimental design, and how to approach real-world data problems. The interviewer will probe your understanding of statistical principles and ML algorithms.
Tips for this round
- Review core machine learning algorithms (e.g., linear models, tree-based models, clustering) and their underlying assumptions.
- Be prepared to discuss experimental design, A/B testing, and causal inference in detail.
- Practice breaking down complex, ambiguous data problems into manageable steps, articulating your approach.
- Articulate your thought process clearly, explaining trade-offs and potential pitfalls in your solutions.
- Understand common evaluation metrics for different ML tasks and when to use them appropriately.
Coding & Algorithms
This round typically involves a live coding challenge, similar to datainterview.com/coding style problems, but may also include elements of designing a data-intensive system or an ML pipeline. You'll be expected to write clean, efficient code while explaining your approach and considering scalability. The interviewer will assess your problem-solving skills and ability to translate requirements into a technical solution.
Product Sense & Metrics
This round assesses your ability to apply data science to business problems and your cultural fit with Palantir. You'll likely encounter product-oriented questions, such as defining metrics, designing experiments, or analyzing product launches. Expect a significant portion dedicated to behavioral questions, exploring your past experiences, teamwork, and how you handle challenges.
Hiring Manager Screen
This final conversation is with a potential hiring manager and focuses on your overall fit for the team and company culture. You'll discuss your career aspirations, how your skills align with the team's needs, and your motivations for joining Palantir. It's an opportunity for both you and the manager to assess mutual fit and for you to ask detailed questions about the role and team.
Tips to Stand Out
- Cultural Fit is Key. Palantir places a huge emphasis on cultural fit and alignment with their mission. Be prepared to discuss your motivations for joining and your comfort with topics like civil liberties and data privacy, as these are central to their work.
- Think Out Loud. For all technical and problem-solving rounds, articulate your thought process clearly and continuously. Interviewers want to understand *how* you think, not just the final answer, especially when dealing with ambiguity.
- Problem Decomposition. Palantir values candidates who can break down complex, ambiguous problems into smaller, manageable components. Practice this skill for case studies, system design, and even coding challenges.
- Deep Technical Acumen. While behavioral aspects are important, a strong foundation in coding, SQL, statistics, and machine learning is non-negotiable. Be ready for both standard datainterview.com/coding-style questions and more non-standard, open-ended technical challenges.
- Ask Questions. Don't hesitate to ask clarifying questions if a problem is unclear or if you need more context. This demonstrates critical thinking, engagement, and a proactive approach to problem-solving.
- No AI Usage. Palantir strictly prohibits the use of AI tools during interviews. Ensure all your work and thought processes are your own, as integrity is highly valued.
Common Reasons Candidates Don't Pass
- ✗Lack of Cultural Alignment. Failing to articulate a compelling reason for wanting to work at Palantir or showing discomfort with their mission and values, particularly regarding data privacy and civil liberties.
- ✗Poor Communication. Inability to clearly explain thought processes, assumptions, or solutions, especially in technical rounds where clarity and articulation are paramount.
- ✗Surface-Level Technical Knowledge. Providing only textbook answers without demonstrating a deep understanding or the ability to apply concepts to novel, ambiguous problems.
- ✗Inability to Decompose Problems. Struggling to break down ambiguous or large-scale problems into actionable steps during case studies or system design challenges.
- ✗Insufficient Behavioral Preparation. Not having well-structured STAR stories that highlight relevant skills, experiences, and how you've handled challenges, leading to vague or unconvincing answers.
Offer & Negotiation
Palantir's compensation packages typically include a competitive base salary, a performance-based bonus, and a significant equity component, often in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) with a standard 4-year vesting schedule (e.g., 25% per year). Key negotiation levers include base salary and the RSU grant. Candidates with competing offers, especially from other top-tier tech companies, have more leverage to negotiate for higher equity or a signing bonus. Be prepared to articulate your value and market worth, and consider the long-term potential of the equity.
Expect roughly four weeks from your first recruiter call to a final decision. From what candidates report, the pace can feel relentless once you're in the loop, so front-load your prep before the process starts rather than counting on downtime between rounds.
The most common rejection pattern isn't a single blown round. It's death by a thousand cuts: surface-level technical answers, vague behavioral stories, and failing to connect your work to Palantir's mission of building for Foundry and AIP deployments. Interviewers across every stage are scoring problem decomposition and clarity of communication, so a candidate who aces algorithms but hand-waves through metrics reasoning or can't articulate why they want to work on defense logistics (not just "data science at a cool company") will struggle to clear the committee.
One thing that catches people off guard: the behavioral and product-oriented signals carry real veto power. Palantir's decision process weighs cultural alignment and mission conviction alongside technical performance, and a weak showing on either dimension can sink an otherwise strong loop.
Palantir Data Scientist Interview Questions
Data Engineering & Foundry Pipelines
Expect scenarios where you must translate messy mission data into reliable, auditable pipelines (incremental loads, backfills, data quality checks). Candidates often struggle to balance speed of delivery with governance expectations common in defense and national security environments.
In Foundry, you ingest daily personnel readiness files from a classified system where 2 to 5 percent of records arrive late and some days replay old rows. How do you design the pipeline so metrics in an Ontology-backed dashboard are correct, auditable, and can be backfilled without rewriting the whole history?
Sample Answer
Most candidates default to an append-only pipeline keyed by ingest time, but that fails here because late arrivals and replays silently corrupt readiness rates and you cannot reproduce a given dashboard cut. Use a deterministic primary key plus event-time partitioning, then implement merge semantics (upsert) with idempotent transforms so reruns do not duplicate rows. Add a backfill path that reprocesses only affected event-time partitions, and write run metadata plus record-level lineage for audit. Put explicit data quality checks on completeness, freshness, and duplicate keys, then block Ontology publish when they fail.
You have two Foundry datasets, "sorties" and "maintenance_logs", and you need a daily asset availability metric by unit for a defense ops review. What Foundry pipeline pattern ensures the metric is stable under late-arriving maintenance logs while keeping compute bounded?
A Foundry pipeline produces a "watchlist anomalies" dataset used for alerting, but analysts report that reruns change yesterday’s anomaly labels even when raw data is unchanged. What concrete changes do you make to guarantee deterministic outputs and explainability for audit in a national security setting?
Product Sense & Operational Metrics
Most candidates underestimate how much your judgment on KPIs and decision-making matters for Foundry deployments (e.g., readiness, allocation, throughput, risk). You’ll be pushed to define success metrics, anticipate tradeoffs, and propose how stakeholders will actually use the output operationally.
A Foundry deployment for aircraft maintenance claims success because average repair turnaround time dropped 15%. What 3 operational metrics do you require to validate this is real improvement and not load-shedding or selection bias?
Sample Answer
Require end-to-end mission impact metrics with guardrails, not just turnaround time. Pair turnaround time with throughput (completed repairs per week) and a quality metric (rework rate or repeat failure within $t$ days) to catch rushed or incomplete work. Add backlog health (age distribution or percent past SLA) to detect load-shedding, plus case-mix controls (severity, aircraft type) so you are not cherry-picking easier jobs.
You need a single North Star metric for a Foundry app that prioritizes intelligence reports for analyst review, where missing a true threat is far worse than reviewing extra noise. Would you optimize expected utility or optimize precision and recall at a threshold, and what operational metric would you show daily to leadership?
A Foundry-backed allocation model routes limited ISR assets across regions, and after launch, incidents detected increased but mission success rate stayed flat. How do you decide whether the product is helping, and what metrics and slices do you inspect before changing the model?
Algorithms & Coding
Your fluency writing correct, efficient code under time pressure is a key signal, even for a data scientist role. Focus on data-wrangling-adjacent coding, edge cases, and complexity reasoning rather than obscure tricks.
In Foundry you ingest an event stream of $(entity\_id, timestamp)$ that can arrive out of order and with duplicates; return a dict mapping each entity to the longest consecutive-day streak (UTC days) it was observed. Ignore duplicates within the same day, and treat a gap of at least 1 missing day as breaking the streak.
Sample Answer
You could sort all timestamps per entity and scan, or you could normalize to day buckets, dedupe, then use a set-based consecutive-sequence algorithm per entity. Sorting wins for simplicity, but the set-based approach wins here because it avoids $O(m \log m)$ per entity when you have heavy duplication and you only care about unique days. Normalize to an integer day index, build a set, then start streaks only at days where $d-1$ is absent.
from __future__ import annotations
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from typing import Any, Dict, Iterable, List, Tuple
def _to_utc_day_index(ts: Any) -> int:
"""Convert a timestamp to an integer UTC day index (days since epoch).
Accepts:
- datetime (naive treated as UTC)
- ISO-8601 string (supports trailing 'Z')
- int/float seconds since epoch
"""
if isinstance(ts, datetime):
dt = ts
if dt.tzinfo is None:
dt = dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
else:
dt = dt.astimezone(timezone.utc)
return int(dt.timestamp()) // 86400
if isinstance(ts, (int, float)):
return int(ts) // 86400
if isinstance(ts, str):
s = ts.strip()
# Handle 'Z' suffix for UTC.
if s.endswith("Z"):
s = s[:-1] + "+00:00"
dt = datetime.fromisoformat(s)
if dt.tzinfo is None:
dt = dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
else:
dt = dt.astimezone(timezone.utc)
return int(dt.timestamp()) // 86400
raise TypeError(f"Unsupported timestamp type: {type(ts)}")
def longest_consecutive_day_streak(
events: Iterable[Tuple[str, Any]]
) -> Dict[str, int]:
"""Return longest consecutive-day observation streak per entity."""
days_by_entity: Dict[str, set[int]] = defaultdict(set)
# Normalize to day buckets and dedupe within a day.
for entity_id, ts in events:
day_idx = _to_utc_day_index(ts)
days_by_entity[entity_id].add(day_idx)
result: Dict[str, int] = {}
# For each entity, compute longest consecutive sequence length.
for entity_id, days in days_by_entity.items():
best = 0
for d in days:
# Only start counting at the beginning of a streak.
if (d - 1) in days:
continue
length = 1
nxt = d + 1
while nxt in days:
length += 1
nxt += 1
if length > best:
best = length
result[entity_id] = best
return result
if __name__ == "__main__":
sample = [
("A", "2026-01-01T10:00:00Z"),
("A", "2026-01-02T09:00:00Z"),
("A", "2026-01-02T12:00:00Z"), # duplicate day
("A", "2026-01-04T00:00:00Z"), # gap breaks streak
("B", "2026-02-10T23:59:59Z"),
("B", "2026-02-11T00:00:01Z"),
]
print(longest_consecutive_day_streak(sample)) # {'A': 2, 'B': 2}
You have Foundry Ontology objects for shipments as directed edges $(from\_site, to\_site)$; write a function that returns all sites that are eventually reachable from a given start site, excluding the start, even if the graph has cycles. Assume up to $10^6$ edges, so recursion is risky.
In a defense ops pipeline you merge two Foundry datasets: intervals of sensor uptime $(start, end)$ and intervals of mission windows $(start, end)$ (both inclusive, seconds since epoch); compute total seconds of mission coverage where at least one sensor is up. Intervals can overlap heavily and are unsorted.
Statistics & Probability
The bar here isn’t whether you can recite formulas, it’s whether you can reason from first principles about uncertainty, bias, and inference. Interviewers probe how you’d validate findings when data is limited, noisy, or operationally confounded.
In Foundry, an anomaly detector flags assets when sensor value $X$ exceeds threshold $t$, and you have $n=50$ labeled events with $k=3$ true positives above $t$. Give a $95\%$ confidence interval for the true alert precision $p$ and say whether you would ship this threshold to an operations team.
Sample Answer
Reason through it: Treat each above-threshold alert as a Bernoulli trial for being a true positive, so $k \sim \text{Binomial}(n,p)$. With small counts, the normal approximation is shaky, use an exact (Clopper-Pearson) or Wilson interval, both will be wide when $k$ is tiny. You are going to report that uncertainty explicitly, because with $k=3$ you cannot credibly claim a stable precision, and shipping the threshold likely creates operational noise unless the cost of false positives is near-zero.
A Foundry dashboard shows a 12% drop in mission-critical supply delays after deploying a new routing policy, but the rollout coincided with a shift from high-tempo to low-tempo regions. How do you quantify uncertainty and separate policy impact from region-mix confounding using only observational data and limited pre-period history?
SQL & Databases
You’ll likely be asked to compute metrics and shape tables the way analysts and pipelines actually need them, using joins, windows, and careful null handling. Watch for pitfalls around double-counting, late-arriving data, and grain mismatches.
In Foundry, you have sensor-level asset telemetry in `telemetry(asset_id, ts, status)` and a slowly changing dimension in `asset_dim(asset_id, effective_start_ts, effective_end_ts, unit_id)`. Write SQL to compute daily uptime rate per unit (uptime seconds divided by observed seconds) for the last 30 days, correctly attributing each telemetry interval to the unit valid at that time.
Sample Answer
This question is checking whether you can align grains across an event stream and an SCD without double counting. You need interval construction with window functions, correct temporal joins to the dimension, and careful handling of the last interval and day boundaries. Most people fail by joining on asset_id only, which silently misattributes uptime when units change. Another common failure is counting rows instead of seconds.
/* Daily uptime rate per unit over the last 30 days.
Assumptions:
- telemetry.status in ('UP','DOWN') (treat non-UP as down).
- telemetry events represent state changes, the state is valid until the next event.
- asset_dim is SCD2 with [effective_start_ts, effective_end_ts) validity, effective_end_ts can be NULL for current.
*/
WITH params AS (
SELECT
DATE_TRUNC('day', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) AS today_start,
DATEADD(day, -30, DATE_TRUNC('day', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)) AS window_start
),
ordered AS (
SELECT
t.asset_id,
t.ts AS start_ts,
LEAD(t.ts) OVER (PARTITION BY t.asset_id ORDER BY t.ts) AS next_ts,
t.status
FROM telemetry t
JOIN params p
ON t.ts >= DATEADD(day, -31, p.window_start) -- pull a bit earlier for correct first interval
AND t.ts < p.today_start
),
intervals AS (
SELECT
o.asset_id,
o.start_ts,
COALESCE(o.next_ts, p.today_start) AS end_ts,
CASE WHEN o.status = 'UP' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS is_up
FROM ordered o
CROSS JOIN params p
WHERE o.start_ts < p.today_start
),
clipped AS (
SELECT
i.asset_id,
GREATEST(i.start_ts, p.window_start) AS start_ts,
LEAST(i.end_ts, p.today_start) AS end_ts,
i.is_up
FROM intervals i
CROSS JOIN params p
WHERE i.end_ts > p.window_start
AND i.start_ts < p.today_start
),
exploded_days AS (
/* Split each interval by day boundaries so you can aggregate daily seconds. */
SELECT
c.asset_id,
d.day_start,
GREATEST(c.start_ts, d.day_start) AS seg_start,
LEAST(c.end_ts, DATEADD(day, 1, d.day_start)) AS seg_end,
c.is_up
FROM clipped c
JOIN (
SELECT
DATEADD(day, seq4(), p.window_start) AS day_start
FROM params p,
TABLE(GENERATOR(ROWCOUNT => 30))
) d
ON c.end_ts > d.day_start
AND c.start_ts < DATEADD(day, 1, d.day_start)
),
with_unit AS (
/* Temporal join to SCD2 to attribute each segment to the correct unit at that time. */
SELECT
e.day_start,
ad.unit_id,
e.seg_start,
e.seg_end,
e.is_up
FROM exploded_days e
JOIN asset_dim ad
ON ad.asset_id = e.asset_id
AND e.seg_start >= ad.effective_start_ts
AND e.seg_start < COALESCE(ad.effective_end_ts, TIMESTAMP '9999-12-31 00:00:00')
)
SELECT
day_start::date AS day,
unit_id,
SUM(DATEDIFF('second', seg_start, seg_end) * is_up) AS uptime_seconds,
SUM(DATEDIFF('second', seg_start, seg_end)) AS observed_seconds,
CASE
WHEN SUM(DATEDIFF('second', seg_start, seg_end)) = 0 THEN NULL
ELSE 1.0 * SUM(DATEDIFF('second', seg_start, seg_end) * is_up)
/ SUM(DATEDIFF('second', seg_start, seg_end))
END AS uptime_rate
FROM with_unit
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY day, unit_id;You ingest `case_event(case_id, event_ts, event_type)` for mission cases, where events can arrive late and there can be duplicates. Write SQL to compute weekly median time to triage in hours (from first `CASE_OPENED` to first `TRIAGED`) for cases opened in the last 12 weeks, deduping events and excluding cases not triaged within 7 days.
Machine Learning (Applied Modeling)
Rather than deep model architecture trivia, you’re evaluated on choosing pragmatic methods for forecasting, anomaly detection, clustering, or optimization in an ops context. Strong answers connect model choice to constraints like interpretability, feedback loops, and deployment reality inside Foundry.
In Foundry you need to forecast daily spare part demand per base with intermittent zeros and occasional surge events tied to exercises. Which baseline model do you start with, what metric do you use for selection, and what tells you to switch families?
Sample Answer
The standard move is a simple seasonal baseline plus an intermittent-demand method like Croston or SBA, scored with a scale-free metric like sMAPE or MASE. But here, surge events matter because they are decision-critical and can be drowned out by average error, so you add event features and evaluate on high-quantile loss or service-level impact. If residuals show systematic under-forecast during exercises, or stockout cost dominates, you switch to a model that targets quantiles or directly optimizes fill-rate. Keep it interpretable enough to defend in front of operators.
You deploy an anomaly detector in Foundry to flag suspicious procurement transactions, but the labeling feedback loop is sparse and delayed. How do you set thresholds and evaluate the model so investigators do not get flooded or miss true positives?
You need to allocate a limited number of ISR sorties across regions each day to maximize expected detections, but detection probabilities are learned from messy historical data with bias from prior patrol patterns. Which modeling approach do you choose, and how do you keep the policy from reinforcing the bias?
Behavioral & Stakeholder Execution
When working with government stakeholders, you must show you can drive outcomes through ambiguity, sensitive constraints, and cross-functional friction. Prepare stories about influencing without authority, handling compliance/security constraints, and delivering iteratively with measurable impact.
A program office wants a Foundry dashboard for mission readiness, but data sources disagree and the Ontology has no canonical definition for "asset availability". How do you drive alignment and ship an MVP in 2 weeks without locking in a wrong metric?
Sample Answer
Get this wrong in production and leadership optimizes the wrong thing, you get "green" readiness while units fail inspections. The right call is to force an explicit metric contract, define availability in the Ontology with lineage and edge cases, then ship an MVP with a versioned definition and a visible data quality panel. You de-risk by running a short metric calibration session with operators, documenting assumptions, and getting sign-off on what decisions the metric will and will not support.
In a classified environment, the security team blocks a data join you need for a predictive maintenance model, and the customer insists on a single integrated view in Foundry. How do you negotiate a path that preserves mission value while staying compliant and on schedule?
An operations lead wants a global optimization model for logistics routing, but the current Foundry pipelines are brittle and data quality is poor, and you have no authority over the source system owners. How do you get from messy reality to an adopted decision workflow in 6 to 8 weeks?
Palantir's question mix is weighted toward skills that live inside Foundry itself: building auditable pipelines over messy classified data, then defining operational KPIs like asset availability or threat detection recall for the government stakeholders who consume those pipelines. Algorithms and ML combined still matter, but the distribution suggests Palantir treats them as table stakes rather than differentiators. If your prep hours skew heavily toward coding puzzles at the expense of practicing Foundry-style pipeline design and mission-specific metric reasoning, you're misallocating effort relative to what the interview actually emphasizes.
Sharpen your statistics, SQL, and operational product sense for Palantir's defense and enterprise contexts at datainterview.com/questions.
How to Prepare for Palantir Data Scientist Interviews
Know the Business
Official mission
“Our purpose is to help our customers bring world-changing solutions to the most complex problems by removing the obstacles between analysts and answers.”
What it actually means
Palantir's real mission is to provide advanced data integration and AI platforms to government and commercial entities, enabling them to analyze complex data, solve critical problems, and make operational decisions. They aim to augment human intelligence and protect liberty through responsible technology use.
Key Business Metrics
$4B
+70% YoY
$322B
+5% YoY
4K
+5% YoY
Business Segments and Where DS Fits
Foundry
A decision-intelligence platform that provides capabilities for data connectivity & integration, model connectivity & development, ontology building, developer toolchain, use case development, analytics, product delivery, security & governance, and management & enablement.
DS focus: AI Platform (AIP), Model connectivity & development, Ontology building, Analytics, operational artificial intelligence
AI Platform (AIP)
An operational artificial intelligence platform, also a capability within Foundry, designed to help enterprises rapidly deploy and operate AI use cases in production.
DS focus: Operational artificial intelligence, deploying AI use cases in production
Current Strategic Priorities
- Help enterprises rapidly deploy and operate Palantir’s Foundry and Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) in production to achieve measurable business outcomes
- Accelerate customer pace of adoption to lead their respective industries
Competitive Moat
Palantir is pouring its energy into getting AIP deployed at scale inside commercial enterprises. Revenue grew 70% year-over-year, and U.S. commercial revenue surged 137% YoY in Q4 2025, which tells you where new DS headcount is flowing. For data scientists, that commercial push means Foundry's ontology layer and AIP's operational AI workflows aren't abstract product concepts; they're the actual tools you'll be expected to build inside.
Read Palantir's engineering blog on end-to-end pipelines before your loop. The most common "why Palantir" mistake is gushing about the technology without showing you understand the forward-deployed model. Palantir's value-based business approach means you sit with a client, diagnose their data mess, build the pipeline in Foundry, and own the operational outcome. Your answer should reference a concrete deployment pattern (ontology modeling for a logistics use case, for instance) and explain why you want to be in the room with the stakeholder, not just writing the model.
Try a Real Interview Question
Windowed Anomaly Alerts From Irregular Sensor Events
pythonGiven a list of events $(t_i, v_i)$ with integer timestamps $t_i$ (not guaranteed sorted) and float values $v_i$, compute for each event whether it is an anomaly relative to the prior $W$ seconds: anomaly if $v_i > \mu + k\sigma$, where $\mu$ and $\sigma$ are the mean and population standard deviation of values with timestamps in $[t_i - W,\ t_i)$; if there are fewer than $m$ prior events in the window, anomaly is False. Return a list of booleans aligned to the original input order.
from typing import List, Tuple
def detect_window_anomalies(
events: List[Tuple[int, float]],
W: int,
k: float,
m: int = 5,
) -> List[bool]:
"""Return anomaly flags for each (timestamp, value) event.
An event i is anomalous if there are at least m prior events with timestamps in
[t_i - W, t_i) and v_i > mean + k * std over those prior values.
Args:
events: List of (timestamp, value) pairs; timestamps may be unsorted.
W: Window size in seconds.
k: Threshold multiplier.
m: Minimum number of prior events required to evaluate.
Returns:
List of booleans aligned with the original events order.
"""
pass
700+ ML coding problems with a live Python executor.
Practice in the EnginePalantir's coding interviews, from what candidates report, reward clean algorithmic thinking under time pressure. Foundry transforms deal with complex data graphs and recursive structures, so problems that test those patterns are fair game. Build your muscle memory with timed practice at datainterview.com/coding.
Test Your Readiness
How Ready Are You for Palantir Data Scientist?
1 / 10Can you design an incremental Foundry-style pipeline (bronze to silver to gold) that handles late-arriving data, schema changes, and backfills while keeping outputs reproducible?
Palantir's interview loop includes dedicated statistics and probability coverage, so treat it as its own prep track. Drill Bayesian reasoning and experimental design at datainterview.com/questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does the Palantir Data Scientist interview process take?
Expect roughly 4 to 6 weeks from application to offer. The process typically starts with a recruiter screen, moves to a technical phone screen, and then an onsite (or virtual onsite) loop. Palantir can move faster for candidates they're excited about, but the security-conscious culture means background steps sometimes add time. I'd plan for at least a month and follow up proactively if things go quiet.
What technical skills are tested in the Palantir Data Scientist interview?
Python and SQL are non-negotiable. You'll also be tested on PySpark and Spark SQL since Palantir's Foundry platform runs on distributed computing. Beyond coding, expect questions on data engineering concepts like ETL pipelines, data modeling, and scalable architectures. Machine learning, statistical modeling, and data visualization all come up too. If you've worked with cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, or GCP, make sure to mention that experience.
How should I tailor my resume for a Palantir Data Scientist role?
Lead with impact, not tools. Palantir is mission-driven and results-oriented, so every bullet should connect your work to a real outcome. Quantify things like pipeline throughput improvements, model accuracy gains, or business metrics you moved. Highlight any experience with operational analytics (supply chain, manufacturing, workforce planning) since that's a huge part of what Palantir deploys for clients. If you've built anything on Foundry or similar data integration platforms, put it near the top.
What is the total compensation for a Palantir Data Scientist?
Palantir is headquartered in Denver, Colorado, and compensation is competitive with top tech companies. Total comp for a mid-level Data Scientist typically ranges from $150K to $200K+ when you factor in base salary, equity (RSUs), and bonus. Senior roles can push well above that. Palantir's equity component is significant, especially post-IPO, so pay close attention to the vesting schedule during offer negotiations.
How do I prepare for the behavioral interview at Palantir?
Palantir cares deeply about mission alignment. They want people who genuinely believe in augmenting human intelligence and solving hard problems for government and commercial clients. Study their core values: engineering excellence, customer partnership, ethical conduct, and privacy protection. Prepare stories about times you partnered closely with non-technical stakeholders, made tough ethical calls with data, or delivered results under ambiguity. Generic answers about teamwork won't cut it here.
How hard are the SQL and coding questions in the Palantir Data Scientist interview?
The SQL questions are medium to hard. You'll need to be comfortable with window functions, complex joins, CTEs, and writing queries that perform well at scale. Python questions often involve data manipulation with pandas or PySpark, not just algorithm puzzles. Palantir leans toward practical, applied problems rather than pure brain teasers. I'd recommend practicing with realistic data problems at datainterview.com/coding to get the right feel for difficulty level.
What machine learning and statistics concepts should I know for Palantir?
They test a solid range. Expect questions on predictive modeling, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, forecasting, and optimization. You should be able to explain model selection tradeoffs, talk through bias-variance, and discuss how you'd validate a model in production. Palantir's work is very applied, so they care less about you reciting textbook definitions and more about whether you can design an ML solution for a messy real-world problem. Practice with scenario-based questions at datainterview.com/questions.
What is the best format for answering Palantir behavioral questions?
Use the STAR format (Situation, Task, Action, Result) but keep it tight. Palantir interviewers are engineers and product thinkers, not HR generalists. They'll lose patience with long setups. Spend 20% on context and 80% on what you actually did and what happened. Always end with a measurable result. And be ready for follow-ups. They'll probe your decisions, so don't exaggerate your role.
What happens during the Palantir Data Scientist onsite interview?
The onsite typically includes 3 to 5 rounds. You'll face a coding round (Python or PySpark), a SQL round, a system design or data modeling session, and at least one behavioral round. Some candidates also get a case study where you walk through how you'd build an analytics solution for a client problem. The interviewers often simulate real Foundry deployment scenarios, so think about end-to-end pipelines, not just isolated models. It's a long day, so pace yourself.
What business metrics and domain concepts should I study for Palantir?
Palantir works heavily in operational analytics. That means supply chain optimization, manufacturing efficiency, workforce planning, and process improvement. You should understand metrics like throughput, cycle time, fill rate, and demand forecasting accuracy. Also brush up on how data platforms create value for enterprise clients. Palantir's $4.5B revenue comes from solving real operational problems, so showing you understand the business side will set you apart from candidates who only talk about algorithms.
Does Palantir test data engineering skills for the Data Scientist role?
Yes, and this catches a lot of candidates off guard. Palantir Data Scientists are expected to build and maintain data pipelines, not just consume clean datasets. You'll need to demonstrate knowledge of ETL processes, data modeling, and scalable architectures. Familiarity with PySpark and Spark SQL is especially important since Foundry runs on distributed compute. If your background is purely modeling with pandas on small datasets, spend serious time leveling up your engineering skills before interviewing.
What common mistakes do candidates make in the Palantir Data Scientist interview?
The biggest one I've seen is treating it like a pure ML interview. Palantir wants full-stack data scientists who can wrangle messy data, build pipelines, and communicate with clients. Another mistake is not connecting your work to mission. Palantir's culture is intense about purpose, so candidates who can't articulate why they want to work on government or enterprise problems often get dinged on culture fit. Finally, don't underestimate the SQL round. It's not a warm-up. It's a real evaluation.




