Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher at a Glance
Interview Rounds
4 rounds
Difficulty
SIG lists "demonstrated interest in strategic games and/or competitive activities" as a required skill for quant researchers, right alongside Python and probability theory. That tells you everything about how this firm thinks about hiring. Your poker hands matter.
Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher Role
Primary Focus
Skill Profile
Math & Stats
ExpertExpertise in probability theory, statistical analysis, and advanced quantitative methods from fields like Mathematics, Physics, Statistics, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Operations Research, or Economics, essential for model building and alpha generation.
Software Eng
HighProficient programming skills for implementing robust models, processing and analyzing large datasets, and collaborating with technologists to integrate strategies into production systems.
Data & SQL
MediumExperience with processing and analyzing large historical market datasets using high-performance research clusters; understanding of data handling for effective model development and backtesting.
Machine Learning
ExpertExpertise in designing, validating, backtesting, and implementing advanced machine learning models to generate alpha signals and enhance trading strategy performance.
Applied AI
MediumFamiliarity with modern artificial intelligence concepts, particularly as they relate to advanced machine learning techniques and their application in quantitative research. (Uncertainty: GenAI specifically is not explicitly mentioned, but AI is implied through advanced ML and related degrees).
Infra & Cloud
LowUnderstanding of how quantitative strategies are pushed into production environments; direct responsibility for infrastructure or cloud deployment is not explicitly stated as primary for this role.
Business
HighDeep understanding of financial markets and trading, enabling the design of impactful strategies, alpha signal research, and performance enhancement.
Viz & Comms
MediumClear and effective communication skills are required for collaboration within a fast-paced, highly intellectual environment.
What You Need
- Strong research capabilities
- Deep understanding of trading
- Analytical problem-solving
- Excellent logical reasoning
- Passion for turning data into decisions
- Clear communication
- Strategic thinking
- Demonstrated interest in strategic games and/or competitive activities
- Self-motivated and quick to learn
- Ability to thrive in dynamic, fast-moving environments
- Ability to process and analyze large data sets
Nice to Have
- Experience with C++ or another low-level language
Languages
Tools & Technologies
Want to ace the interview?
Practice with real questions.
Your job is to find, validate, and ship signals that make SIG's options and equities market-making desks more profitable. You'll write Python (and sometimes C++) against tick-level historical data on SIG's large research clusters, building features, running backtests, and defending every assumption in front of traders who will challenge your methodology. Success means moving a signal from notebook prototype to production where it contributes real PnL, not just publishing a promising Sharpe ratio internally.
A Typical Week
A Week in the Life of a Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher
Typical L5 workweek · Susquehanna International Group
Weekly time split
Culture notes
- SIG quant researchers typically work 7 AM to 5-6 PM with intensity anchored around market hours, and the culture rewards intellectual rigor and game-theoretic thinking over face time — but the pace is demanding and the bar for signal quality is very high.
- The role is fully in-office at the Bala Cynwyd campus, reflecting SIG's strong emphasis on real-time collaboration between quants and traders sitting on the same desk.
Most of your week isn't coding. The split between explaining your work (in PnL attribution meetings, 1:1s with senior researchers, and Thursday signal presentations) and actually building it is closer to even than candidates expect. SIG's culture of rigorous pushback means you rehearse your reasoning constantly, which is why the game theory mindset matters even on a random Tuesday afternoon when a colleague challenges your out-of-sample testing framework.
Projects & Impact Areas
Core options and equities market-making signal research is where most quant researchers spend the majority of their time, improving volatility surface models and extracting features from order flow microstructure data. SIG also has an active prediction markets specialization (they're hiring quant researchers specifically for it), which poses a fundamentally different challenge: pricing event contracts where historical analogs are thin or nonexistent. Crypto market-making and portfolio construction round out the research surface, with quant researchers contributing frameworks for digital asset liquidity dynamics that behave nothing like traditional equities.
Skills & What's Expected
Expert-level ML and expert-level probability/statistics are both required here, not one at the expense of the other. What's genuinely underrated is business acumen: SIG rates it "high" because you need to reason about transaction costs, adverse selection, and slippage before your signal ever touches production. Comfort with data engineering basics (debugging corrupted data partitions, managing backtest infrastructure on research clusters) won't be your primary focus, but ignoring it will slow you down on mornings when a cluster job fails at 3 AM and you're the one who has to fix the data pull script.
Levels & Career Growth
SIG's flat structure means PnL impact drives promotion, not tenure or headcount management. PhD new grads and experienced hires both get real ownership quickly, but the blocker most researchers hit when trying to move up isn't technical ability. It's the inability to convince traders that a signal is genuinely robust rather than a backtest artifact.
Work Culture
SIG operates in-office at the Bala Cynwyd campus outside Philadelphia, with the culture emphasizing real-time collaboration between quants and traders sitting on the same desk. Hours run roughly 7 AM to 5 or 6 PM, anchored to market hours. Challenging someone's idea directly is expected (and reciprocated), reviews highlight genuine meritocracy and strong benefits, and the game theory training that comes with the job actually sharpens how you think about risk.
Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher Compensation
SIG's comp structure is cash-heavy: a competitive base salary plus a performance bonus that, according to the firm's own framing, depends on both individual and firm-wide results. The bonus component makes up a substantial share of total comp, so expect meaningful year-to-year variance. There may also be long-term incentives in the mix, though details on those aren't publicly standardized, so ask your recruiter directly.
Base salary has some room for negotiation, which is worth knowing because many candidates assume it's fixed and skip straight to discussing bonus. The bonus structure, by contrast, is where SIG is less flexible. Your single biggest lever is demonstrating unique skills that map to SIG's specific needs (pricing novel event contracts for the Robinhood prediction markets joint venture, or crypto market-making experience) rather than relying on generic market-rate arguments.
Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher Interview Process
4 rounds·~6 weeks end to end
Initial Screen
2 roundsBehavioral
After your resume passes the initial screening, you'll receive a link to the SIG Problem Solving Assessment, administered via Mettl. This 60-minute test consists of 17 open-ended questions designed to evaluate your core quantitative skills, logical reasoning, and problem-solving abilities. Expect challenges that require a strong foundation in mathematics and quick analytical thinking.
Tips for this round
- Practice solving linear systems of equations and calculating expected values under time pressure.
- Familiarize yourself with common brain-teaser questions and complex puzzles, such as grid path-finding problems.
- Utilize resources like Tradermath's Black II Test to simulate the actual assessment environment and question types.
- Develop a strategy for tackling open-ended questions efficiently, as time management is crucial.
- Review fundamental probability concepts, as these are frequently tested in quantitative assessments.
- Ensure you have a quiet environment and a stable internet connection before starting the assessment.
Hiring Manager Screen
The phone interview serves as an initial conversation to delve deeper into your background and assess your problem-solving capabilities. You'll discuss your resume, past experiences, and motivations for a Quantitative Researcher role at SIG. Expect to tackle some initial quantitative problems to demonstrate your analytical thinking.
Technical Assessment
1 roundStatistics & Probability
This technical interview will intensely focus on probability-based questions and your overall technical expertise in quantitative finance. You'll be challenged with complex probability scenarios, statistical inference problems, and potentially questions related to stochastic processes. The interviewer will probe your understanding of underlying mathematical principles.
Tips for this round
- Master advanced probability concepts, including conditional probability, Bayes' theorem, expected values, and variance calculations.
- Be proficient in common probability distributions (e.g., binomial, Poisson, normal) and their applications.
- Practice solving brain teasers and probability puzzles that require creative problem-solving and clear logical steps.
- Review fundamental statistical concepts such as hypothesis testing, regression, and time series analysis.
- Be ready to discuss your approach to modeling and analyzing data, even if not directly coding.
- Clearly communicate your assumptions and reasoning throughout the problem-solving process.
Onsite
1 roundBehavioral
The final stage is a comprehensive onsite experience, typically involving multiple interviews throughout the day. You'll face a series of technical challenges, often including more advanced probability and quantitative problems, alongside discussions with HR to assess your cultural fit and overall readiness for the role. Expect to interact with various team members, including senior quants and traders.
Tips for this round
- Prepare for a full day of interviews, maintaining energy and focus throughout multiple technical and behavioral discussions.
- Be ready to solve complex, multi-part quantitative problems on a whiteboard, articulating your thought process at each step.
- Showcase your ability to collaborate and communicate effectively, as teamwork is crucial in a trading environment.
- Prepare specific examples from your past experiences that demonstrate problem-solving, resilience, and a passion for quantitative research.
- Ask insightful questions to each interviewer, demonstrating your engagement and understanding of their work.
- Understand SIG's unique culture, which emphasizes game theory, poker, and competitive thinking, and be prepared to discuss how you align with it.
Tips to Stand Out
- Master Probability and Statistics. SIG places a heavy emphasis on these areas. Dedicate significant time to practicing complex probability puzzles, expected value calculations, and statistical inference problems. Understand the intuition behind formulas, not just memorization.
- Sharpen Mental Math and Logic. The online assessments and early technical rounds often feature brain teasers and quick quantitative problems. Practice mental arithmetic, logical deduction, and efficient problem-solving under time constraints.
- Communicate Your Thought Process. For all technical questions, interviewers are as interested in *how* you arrive at an answer as the answer itself. Articulate your assumptions, reasoning, and steps clearly and concisely.
- Understand Trading Firm Culture. SIG is a proprietary trading firm with a distinct culture often influenced by game theory and competitive strategy. Research their values and be prepared to discuss how your personality and approach align with such an environment.
- Prepare Behavioral Stories. Have several STAR method stories ready that highlight your problem-solving skills, ability to learn, teamwork, handling of failure, and motivation for a quantitative research role in finance.
- Ask Thoughtful Questions. Always have intelligent questions prepared for your interviewers. This demonstrates your engagement, curiosity, and genuine interest in the role and the company.
- Practice Whiteboard Coding/Problem Solving. For onsite technical rounds, you'll likely be asked to solve problems on a whiteboard. Practice writing out your solutions clearly and explaining them verbally.
Common Reasons Candidates Don't Pass
- ✗Weak Probability Fundamentals. Many candidates struggle with the depth and complexity of probability questions, failing to demonstrate a robust understanding beyond basic textbook examples.
- ✗Poor Communication of Solutions. Even with correct answers, candidates are often rejected if they cannot clearly articulate their thought process, assumptions, and logical steps to the interviewer.
- ✗Lack of Mental Agility. The fast-paced nature of SIG's interviews requires quick thinking and mental math proficiency. Hesitation or slowness in solving problems can be a significant drawback.
- ✗Insufficient Cultural Fit. SIG values specific traits like competitiveness, intellectual curiosity, and a collaborative yet independent spirit. Candidates who don't align with this culture, or fail to demonstrate it, often don't progress.
- ✗Inability to Handle Pressure. The interview process is designed to be rigorous. Candidates who falter under pressure or become flustered when challenged may be seen as not suitable for the demanding environment.
- ✗Limited Practical Application. While theoretical knowledge is crucial, candidates who cannot connect their quantitative skills to practical, real-world trading or research scenarios may be viewed as less impactful.
Offer & Negotiation
Quantitative Researcher compensation at Susquehanna International Group typically includes a competitive base salary, a significant performance-based bonus, and potentially long-term incentives. The bonus component is often a substantial portion of total compensation and is highly dependent on individual and firm performance. While base salary might have some room for negotiation, the bonus structure is generally less flexible. Focus on demonstrating your value and unique skills to secure a strong initial offer, and be prepared to discuss your compensation expectations based on your experience and market rates for top-tier quantitative roles.
The process runs about six weeks end-to-end, from what candidates report. The most common reason people wash out isn't weak math. It's poor communication across all technical rounds. SIG's rejection patterns show that candidates who can't articulate assumptions, narrate logical steps, or connect their reasoning to practical trading contexts get cut even when their answers are directionally correct.
The final onsite is a full-day affair mixing quantitative problems with behavioral discussions, and the behavioral component carries real weight. SIG's culture grew out of poker and game theory, so expect the onsite panel to care deeply about how you think through ambiguous decisions, not just how you solve textbook probability. Candidates who coast through behavioral portions while grinding only on stats prep tend to underestimate how much those conversations factor into the final hiring decision.
Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher Interview Questions
Probability & Stochastic Reasoning
Expect questions that force you to compute probabilities under pressure and justify each assumption (conditioning, independence, stopping times). Candidates stumble when they jump to formulas instead of building a clean sample space and reasoning step-by-step.
A binary prediction market trades contracts that pay $1$ if an event happens. If the market mid is $p=0.62$ and you have an internal model giving $q=0.66$, what is $\mathbb{E}[\text{PnL}]$ per contract for buying at the mid, and what hidden assumption makes this calculation invalid in real SIG trading?
Sample Answer
Most candidates default to $\mathbb{E}[\text{PnL}]=q-p$, but that fails here because it silently assumes you can trade at the mid with zero spread, zero fees, and no adverse selection. Under that toy assumption the expected PnL is $0.66-0.62=0.04$ dollars per contract. In reality you cross the spread or pay fees, and your fill probability depends on information, so you need $\mathbb{E}[\text{PnL}\mid\text{filled}]$ and execution costs, not raw $q-p$.
Two independent sources drive a sudden price move in a prediction market: informed trading arrives as a Poisson process with rate $\lambda_I$ and uninformed noise as Poisson with rate $\lambda_N$. What is the probability the first arrival you see in the tape is informed, and what is the distribution of the waiting time to the first arrival?
You observe daily market-implied probabilities $p_t$ for an event until resolution at time $T$, and you suspect $p_t$ behaves like a martingale under the market filtration, $\mathbb{E}[p_{t+1}\mid\mathcal{F}_t]=p_t$. If you stop trading at the first time $\tau$ that $p_t$ exceeds $0.9$ (or at $T$ if it never does), what is $\mathbb{E}[p_\tau]$ in terms of $p_0$, and which technical condition decides whether this is actually valid?
Mathematical Foundations for Markets
Your ability to reason about optimization, linear algebra, and calculus shows up as soon as you discuss pricing/forecast aggregation and risk. You’ll be pushed to derive results quickly and explain why they matter for trading decisions, not just prove them.
In a SIG prediction market you model the latent event probability $p$ with log-odds $x = \log\frac{p}{1-p}$ and place a Gaussian prior $x \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu,\sigma^2)$. After observing $y$ buys and $n-y$ sells from traders whose probability of buying is $\sigma(x)=\frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$, derive the MAP estimate $\hat{x}$ equation you would solve and state a Newton update step.
Sample Answer
You solve for $\hat{x}$ as the root of $(y-n\sigma(x)) - \frac{x-\mu}{\sigma^2}=0$, then run Newton iterations. The log-posterior is $\ell(x)= yx - n\log(1+e^x) - \frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}+C$, so $\ell'(x)= y-n\sigma(x) - \frac{x-\mu}{\sigma^2}$. The Hessian is $\ell''(x)= -n\sigma(x)(1-\sigma(x)) - \frac{1}{\sigma^2}<0$, so Newton is stable and gives $x_{t+1}=x_t-\frac{\ell'(x_t)}{\ell''(x_t)}$.
You quote a two-outcome prediction market with a proper scoring rule based on a convex cost function $C(q)$, where the marginal price is $p(q)=\nabla C(q)$. Show how the bid ask spread you charge for risk limits can be expressed via a quadratic approximation of $C$ around current inventory $q_0$, and explain what matrix controls the inventory-sensitive skew.
Statistics, Estimation & Backtesting Discipline
Most candidates underestimate how much SIG cares about measurement: variance, bias, confidence intervals, and what makes a backtest believable. You’ll need to diagnose pitfalls like multiple testing, non-stationarity, and selection bias with concrete fixes.
You have 2 years of per-contract weekly returns from a prediction-market market-making strategy with strong autocorrelation and volatility clustering. How do you estimate a 95% confidence interval for mean weekly return without overstating significance?
Sample Answer
You could use an IID $t$-interval on the sample mean or a dependence-robust interval (block bootstrap or Newey-West HAC). The IID interval wins only when returns are close to independent, which is not your setting. HAC or block bootstrap wins here because it inflates the standard error to reflect serial correlation, so your $p$-values stop being fantasy.
You test 500 candidate signals for predicting next-hour midprice move in a thin prediction market, select the top 5 by in-sample Sharpe, then backtest them on the same period and get Sharpe $= 2.5$. How do you estimate the expected out-of-sample Sharpe and its uncertainty while controlling for multiple testing?
Your backtest for a prediction-market market-maker marks to mid and shows strong profits, but live PnL is flat; you suspect fill bias and stale quotes. What statistical checks and backtest changes would you implement to make the results believable?
Machine Learning for Alpha Signals
The bar here isn't whether you know model names, it's whether you can choose, validate, and stress-test models that could survive noisy market data. Expect tradeoffs around feature leakage, calibration, overfitting control, and evaluation aligned to PnL and risk.
You build a daily alpha classifier for Kalshi-style binary event contracts using order book features plus lagged implied probability, and offline AUC looks strong but live PnL is flat. What are the top three leakage or evaluation traps you would check, and how would you redesign the validation to align with expected log growth or risk-adjusted PnL?
Sample Answer
Reason through it: Start by assuming the model is cheating, then hunt for label-adjacent features, for example using the last traded price after the decision timestamp, post-resolution volume, or any feature computed with the full-day close when you claim a morning signal. Next, check the split, random splits on time-series leak regime and event-level information, so you need a purged, embargoed, time-ordered split at the event level, not just at the row level. Then tie metrics to trading, AUC can improve while the model is uncalibrated in the tails, so validate with calibration curves, Brier score, and a backtest that maps predicted edge $\hat{p} - p_{mkt}$ into position sizing with costs and limits. Finally, stress test stability, look for performance collapse around volatility spikes, wide spreads, and near-expiry, those are where naive cross-validation lies.
You have a model that outputs a probability $\hat{p}_t$ that an event resolves to 1, and the market implied probability is $p_{m,t}$ from the mid price; you can trade at bid and ask with spread $s_t$ and fees $f$. How do you turn $\hat{p}_t$ into a trading rule and position size that avoids overbetting when $\hat{p}_t$ is miscalibrated, and what diagnostics tell you the rule should be cut off or shrunk?
Prediction Markets & Market Microstructure
In prediction markets, you’ll be evaluated on how you translate beliefs into prices and prices into trades while respecting transaction costs and liquidity. Interviewers look for microstructure intuition—order book dynamics, adverse selection, and when forecasts should move the market.
On a binary prediction market contract that settles at $1$ if an event occurs, you observe best bid $b$ and best ask $a$ in dollars. Under a no-arbitrage, risk-neutral assumption, what probability interval is implied, and what does the width $a-b$ mean for execution quality?
Sample Answer
This question is checking whether you can translate microstructure quotes into beliefs while respecting frictions. The implied probability lies in $[b, a]$ because a buy pays $1$ with probability $p$ so the fair price is $p$, but you must cross the spread to trade. The width $a-b$ is the market's compensation for inventory risk and adverse selection, it is your immediate implementation shortfall if you trade now.
You have a model for the true event probability $p_t$ and you can post or take liquidity in SIG-style prediction markets; define a decision rule for when to post a passive buy at $b$ versus crossing to buy at $a$. Your rule must explicitly use queue position, fill probability, and adverse selection from informative order flow.
You run an automated market maker for a prediction contract using a log scoring rule LMSR with liquidity parameter $b$, and you observe a burst of informed flow after a news headline. How do you detect toxic flow from the order book and adjust quoting or inventory limits without breaking the pricing rule?
Research Coding (Python/C++ for Data & Modeling)
You’ll likely be asked to turn a sketch of a model or analysis into correct, testable code fast, often with messy time-series data. What trips people up is writing something that works on toy inputs but fails on edge cases, performance, or numerical stability.
You have tick-level quotes for a prediction market contract with columns (ts_ns, bid, ask, last, volume), but ts_ns has gaps and occasional out-of-order rows. Write Python to compute 1-second midprice returns $r_t=\log(m_t)-\log(m_{t-1})$ using the last observed bid and ask within each second, and drop seconds where either side is missing.
Sample Answer
The standard move is to resample to 1-second bars and forward-fill state like bid and ask. But here, out-of-order ticks matter because naive resampling can pick the wrong last quote for a second and silently flip returns. Sort, take last quote per second, then compute log returns only where both sides are present.
from __future__ import annotations
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def one_second_midprice_log_returns(quotes: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.Series:
"""Compute 1-second midprice log returns from messy tick quotes.
Parameters
----------
quotes : pd.DataFrame
Columns: ts_ns (int nanoseconds since epoch), bid, ask.
Extra columns are ignored. Rows may be out of order.
Returns
-------
pd.Series
Indexed by 1-second timestamps (UTC), values are log returns.
Seconds where bid or ask is missing are dropped.
"""
required = {"ts_ns", "bid", "ask"}
missing = required.difference(quotes.columns)
if missing:
raise ValueError(f"Missing required columns: {sorted(missing)}")
df = quotes[["ts_ns", "bid", "ask"]].copy()
# Parse timestamps and sort to make "last quote in the second" meaningful.
df["ts"] = pd.to_datetime(df["ts_ns"], unit="ns", utc=True)
df = df.sort_values("ts", kind="mergesort") # stable sort
# Floor to 1-second buckets.
df["sec"] = df["ts"].dt.floor("s")
# Take the last observed bid and ask within each second.
per_sec = df.groupby("sec", sort=True).agg({"bid": "last", "ask": "last"})
# Drop seconds with missing side.
per_sec = per_sec.dropna(subset=["bid", "ask"])
# Midprice, guard against nonpositive values.
mid = (per_sec["bid"] + per_sec["ask"]) / 2.0
mid = mid.where(mid > 0)
# Compute log returns; drop the first NaN.
r = np.log(mid).diff()
r = r.dropna()
r.name = "mid_log_return_1s"
return r
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Minimal sanity check with messy ordering and gaps.
q = pd.DataFrame(
{
"ts_ns": [
2_000_000_100, # 2.0000001s
1_500_000_000, # 1.5s
2_900_000_000, # 2.9s
3_100_000_000, # 3.1s
],
"bid": [0.48, 0.47, 0.49, 0.50],
"ask": [0.52, 0.53, 0.51, 0.54],
}
)
out = one_second_midprice_log_returns(q)
print(out)
You are backtesting a SIG-style predictor for contract direction using a rolling $z$-score feature $z_t=(x_t-\mu_t)/\sigma_t$ where $\mu_t$ and $\sigma_t$ are computed over the previous $W$ observations only (no leakage). Implement a numerically stable rolling $z$-score in Python that runs in $O(n)$ time, returns NaN until the window is full, and handles near-zero variance with an $\varepsilon$ floor.
You model an event contract with a logistic regression where the label is whether the midprice goes up in the next 5 seconds, but positive moves are rare (about 2%). Write Python to fit a weighted logistic regression with L2 regularization using gradient descent from scratch (no sklearn), report the weighted log loss each epoch, and include a stable sigmoid implementation.
SIG's prediction markets push shows up directly in how they weight questions: the Prediction Markets & Market Microstructure slice is small on its own, but interviewers routinely embed prediction market setups (Kalshi-style binary contracts, event probability pricing) into probability and statistics problems, so the topic bleeds across categories in ways the chart can't capture. That compounding effect means you'll derive a posterior update on an event contract's true probability, then immediately get pressed on whether your backtest of that signal would survive a multiple comparisons critique. The single biggest prep mistake is treating the six areas as independent buckets when SIG's poker-rooted culture rewards candidates who fluidly connect probabilistic reasoning to honest self-assessment of statistical evidence, exactly the way a market maker must think before sizing a bet on a novel event contract.
Drill SIG-relevant probability chains and prediction market pricing problems at datainterview.com/questions.
How to Prepare for Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher Interviews
Know the Business
Official mission
“We commit our own capital to trade financial products around the world.”
What it actually means
To leverage quantitative skills, game theory, and collaborative decision-making to build successful trading strategies and make proprietary investments across global financial markets, generating profit through sophisticated market making and trading activities.
Business Segments and Where DS Fits
Market Making
Provides liquidity for financial markets, including prediction markets and derivatives, and acts as a key partner in launching new exchanges.
Current Strategic Priorities
- Partner with Robinhood to launch a CFTC-licensed futures and derivatives exchange and clearinghouse
- Expand prediction market offerings through a joint venture
- Provide day-one liquidity for a new prediction markets exchange
SIG's near-term priorities center on a joint venture with Robinhood to launch a CFTC-licensed prediction markets exchange and clearinghouse, with SIG committed to providing day-one liquidity. For quant researchers, this likely means working on pricing and risk models for event contracts where historical data is sparse and the contract structures themselves are still evolving. SIG is also actively investing in digital assets, which suggests crypto market-making and portfolio construction are live research areas alongside traditional equities and options.
The "why SIG?" answer that actually lands ties directly to the firm's poker-player origins. SIG's founding story isn't decoration; the firm still runs game theory and poker training because they believe every research decision, from signal selection to position sizing, is an expected value problem with incomplete information. Don't just say you admire the culture. Describe a specific moment where you quantified uncertainty others were hand-waving, or where you updated a belief mid-project because new data shifted the posterior. That's the language SIG's interviewers recognize as native, not borrowed.
Try a Real Interview Question
Log Score and Brier Score for Prediction Market Forecasts
pythonYou are given $n$ prediction market probabilities $p_i$ for a binary event and realized outcomes $y_i \in \{0,1\}$. Implement a function that returns the mean negative log loss $$-\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \left[y_i\log(p_i)+(1-y_i)\log(1-p_i)\right]$$ and the mean Brier score $$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (p_i-y_i)^2$$, using clipping $p_i \leftarrow \min(1-\epsilon,\max(\epsilon,p_i))$ with input $\epsilon$. Return a tuple $(\text{logloss},\text{brier})$ as floats.
from typing import Iterable, Tuple
def score_forecasts(ps: Iterable[float], ys: Iterable[int], eps: float = 1e-15) -> Tuple[float, float]:
"""Compute mean negative log loss and mean Brier score for binary forecasts.
Args:
ps: Iterable of predicted probabilities.
ys: Iterable of realized outcomes, each 0 or 1.
eps: Clipping parameter for probabilities.
Returns:
(mean_logloss, mean_brier)
"""
pass
700+ ML coding problems with a live Python executor.
Practice in the EngineSIG's Quantitative Researcher job postings explicitly require Python fluency and production-grade modeling code, so expect coding problems that ask you to simulate, manipulate data, or implement a probabilistic model rather than optimize an abstract algorithm. Build that muscle at datainterview.com/coding.
Test Your Readiness
How Ready Are You for Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher?
1 / 10Can you compute and explain conditional probabilities and expectations (including Bayes rule) in multi-step problems with correlated events?
Sharpen your pattern recognition on probability and statistics problems calibrated to quant finance interviews at datainterview.com/questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does the Susquehanna International Group Quantitative Researcher interview process take?
Expect the full process to run about 4 to 8 weeks from first contact to offer. It typically starts with a recruiter screen, moves to one or two technical phone rounds, and then an onsite (or virtual equivalent) at their Bala Cynwyd headquarters. Scheduling can move faster if you have competing deadlines. SIG tends to be efficient, but the onsite day itself is intensive, so don't expect a quick turnaround on the final decision.
What technical skills are tested in the SIG Quantitative Researcher interview?
You'll be tested heavily on probability, statistics, and logical reasoning. Python is the primary language they care about, with some C++ knowledge expected depending on the team. Expect brainteasers and mental math problems that test how you think under pressure. They also dig into your ability to reason about trading strategies and expected value calculations. If you want to sharpen your coding and quantitative skills, check out datainterview.com/coding for practice problems.
How should I tailor my resume for a Susquehanna Quantitative Researcher role?
Lead with research experience, quantitative projects, and anything involving turning data into actionable decisions. SIG specifically values strategic games and competitive activities, so list poker, chess, or math competition experience prominently. Highlight Python and C++ proficiency with concrete examples. Keep it to one page. If you've built trading models, backtesting frameworks, or done any work with financial data, that should be front and center.
What is the total compensation for a Quantitative Researcher at Susquehanna International Group?
SIG is known for paying very competitively in the quant trading space. Entry-level quantitative researchers can expect total compensation in the range of $200K to $350K when you factor in base salary plus bonus. Senior quant researchers with a few years of strong performance can see total comp climb well above $400K. Bonuses at SIG are heavily performance-driven and tied to the profitability of the strategies you work on, so the upside can be significant.
How do I prepare for the behavioral interview at SIG for a Quantitative Researcher position?
SIG cares a lot about good decision-making, teamwork, and growth mindset. Prepare stories that show you making smart choices under uncertainty, not just following a playbook. They want to see that you can collaborate and communicate clearly with traders and other researchers. Have examples ready about times you were wrong, adapted quickly, and learned from it. Integrity matters here too, so be honest about your contributions rather than inflating them.
How hard are the coding questions in the SIG Quantitative Researcher interview?
The coding questions are moderate to hard, but they're more focused on quantitative problem-solving than pure software engineering. You'll mostly code in Python. Problems often involve simulations, probability estimation, or data manipulation rather than classic algorithm puzzles. That said, you still need solid fundamentals in data structures and writing clean, efficient code. Practice quantitative coding problems at datainterview.com/questions to get a feel for the style.
What probability and statistics concepts should I know for the Susquehanna Quantitative Researcher interview?
Probability is the backbone of this interview. You need to be sharp on conditional probability, Bayes' theorem, expected value, variance, and common distributions (normal, binomial, Poisson). They'll also test combinatorics and basic stochastic processes. Hypothesis testing and regression come up too. SIG loves asking probability brainteasers that require you to think on your feet, so drilling these concepts until they're second nature is essential.
What should I expect during the Susquehanna onsite interview for Quantitative Researcher?
The onsite at SIG's Bala Cynwyd office is a full day. You'll go through multiple rounds with different interviewers, covering probability, coding, logical reasoning, and behavioral fit. Some rounds are rapid-fire mental math and brainteasers. Others are deeper technical discussions about your research experience and how you'd approach building a trading strategy. Lunch is usually with a team member, and yes, they're still evaluating you. Come prepared to think out loud for several hours straight.
What trading and business concepts should I understand for the SIG Quant Researcher interview?
You should understand expected value, risk-reward tradeoffs, market microstructure basics, and how options pricing works at a high level. SIG is a market maker, so knowing what that means and how bid-ask spreads work will help. They care about game theory and strategic thinking, so be ready to discuss concepts like Nash equilibrium and optimal decision-making under incomplete information. You don't need to be a finance expert, but showing genuine curiosity about markets goes a long way.
How should I structure my answers to behavioral questions at Susquehanna?
Keep it tight. I recommend a modified STAR format: Situation, Action, Result, and then a brief reflection on what you learned. SIG values growth mindset, so that reflection piece matters more here than at most places. Don't ramble. Two minutes per answer is the sweet spot. Pick stories that show analytical thinking, collaboration, and intellectual honesty. If you made a mistake in the story, own it and explain how it changed your approach.
Does Susquehanna International Group test game theory in the Quantitative Researcher interview?
Yes, and this is one thing that makes SIG different from other quant firms. They have a strong culture around strategic games, poker especially. You might get asked game theory puzzles or questions about optimal strategy in competitive scenarios. Showing that you've played poker, chess, or competitive math at a serious level is a real advantage. Even if you haven't, demonstrating that you can reason through strategic decisions with incomplete information is what they're looking for.
What are common mistakes candidates make in the SIG Quantitative Researcher interview?
The biggest mistake I see is jumping to an answer without explaining your reasoning. SIG interviewers care more about your thought process than getting the exact right number. Another common pitfall is underestimating the mental math and brainteaser rounds. People prep the coding and stats but freeze on rapid-fire probability questions. Finally, don't fake interest in markets or trading. They can tell. If you're genuinely excited about turning data into trading decisions, let that come through naturally.



